Generic parameter not assigned?

Forums 💬 NodeCanvas ⚙️ Support Generic parameter not assigned?

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #15502
    orion
    Participant

      So I have an issue with a custom ActionTask that uses generic parameters in an FSM.

      When I run the FSM, the parameters don’t get assigned and the parameter values end up being null.

      The ActionTask:
      [attachment file=”devenv_1XDpY2NDsr.png”]

      The base class that makes it work with UniTask for async execution (this generally works, since all my other tasks are based on this):
      [attachment file=”devenv_bjbPDapbug.png”]

      The action in the FSM:
      [attachment file=”Unity_OVdlLV5uR0.png”]

      The blackboard:
      [attachment file=”Unity_tfN8p7CTnP.png”]

      …continued in reply…

      #15504
      orion
      Participant

        It does recognize the type of T (it logs DataLoot). If I assign the parameters at runtime, it also picks up on them:
        [attachment file=”Unity_Yl9JXxJlWT.png”]

        However, it still does not get assigned.

        Just executed with dynamic variables:
        [attachment file=”devenv_uhGXoP6iEc.png”]

        Assigned manually at runtime:
        [attachment file=”devenv_VUupW3hIEt.png”]

        I’d like to keep this generic and not make a separate function for every type that I might want to run this on. Is there a way to work around this?

        #15503
        orion
        Participant

          Thank you everyone for rubber ducking. The solution was to add “where T : class” to the action. After plenty of reloading and regenerating AOTClasses it now works fine.

          PS: Could you please add a way to automate “Generate AOTClasses.cs and link.xml Files”, since I don’t see why my input is needed to find the same paths over and over, but I have to run this like 10 times a day and it’s gotten pretty annoying.

          EDIT: Oh, and yeah, obviously with the change above I’m sacrificing being able to use value types, but this is good enough for me. If someone has a solution that will also work for value types, that would be interesting.

        Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.